Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter23

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 44KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

(This recording is a product of Audio Books, Inc., Box 16428, Fort
Worth, Texas 76133)

    Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is April 24, 1977, and
this is my monthly Audioletter No. 23.

    Two months ago in Audioletter No. 21 for February 1977, I
explained how America had been turned into a nation-wide energy addict
over the course of two generations and more, and how this energy
addiction is to be used against us by the four Rockefeller brothers in
turning off our national security; and just four days ago, on April
20, 1977, this process got under way in earnest by way of David
Rockefeller's revolutionary energy program announced to the world by
his employee, Jimmy Carter. To the casual observer it must seem
incredible--a new administration under a new President, with no
previous experience in Washington, has in only three short months done
what no previous administration has ever succeeded in doing: developed
a comprehensive, detailed energy program for the most complex economy
on earth. Furthermore, Mr. Carter tells us that we must do as he tells
us in order to avoid "a national catastrophe"; and he says we must act
now. Why the rush? Why this sudden urgency? And why does he go out of
his way to call his energy program "the moral equivalent of war"? The
answer lies in what I warned you about at the end of monthly
Audioletter No. 22 just last month.

    The CIA is hard at work arranging what is to be the CIA's crowning
achievement--the staging of a horrendous act of terrorism that is
intended to cause war to erupt in the whole of the Middle East. This
is to set in motion a modified, up-dated version of the detailed war
plan I revealed in monthly Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975. This
plan includes a limited nuclear strike from the Sinai to cap off Arab
OPEC oil wells except those in Libya, which is controlled by the CIA.
This will lead immediately to very harsh energy rationing in the
United States, and the Federal government will at last get to issue
those precious gas rationing coupons that have been awaiting use now
for over three years. So the Carter energy plan with its underlying
warlike atmosphere is actually the first step in a gradual shift unto
a war footing for the United States. It has the same purpose as the
declaration of national emergency which President Franklin D.
Roosevelt proclaimed in May 1941, six months before Pearl Harbor, to
start getting America ready for war he was helping to bring about. The
second major step in our progressive shift onto war footing is
intended to occur the time of the cut-off of Middle East oil, by war.
This will provide a perfect excuse for an actual Declaration of
National Emergency, and that in turn will activate all the dictatorial
presidential powers spelled out in Executive Order 11921 signed by
President Ford very quietly in June 1976, and described in my
Audioletter No. 14 for July 1976.

    Audioletter No. 14, of course, is also the issue in which I first
revealed the presence of Soviet underwater missiles and bombs in our
own territorial waters. The terrible Middle East incident now brewing,
which I fervently hope and pray will somehow be sidetracked by its
advanced exposure, is to cause a limited nuclear war in the Middle
East. That in turn is supposed to initiate a chain of events,
culminating in Nuclear War One between the Soviet Union and the United
States of America. Originally this was to have been a carefully
programmed war for the mutual benefit of the Rockefeller cartel and
their Soviet allies, with the Rockefellers and their intimates riding
out the war safely in the nuclear-safe zone across the northern United
States; but ever since the Soviet Union began its double cross of the
Rockefellers last summer 1976, the plans for war have been undergoing
frantic revisions. Even the insane Rockefeller concessions to the
Soviets, embodied in the Red Friday agreement of October 1, 1976
(which I revealed that month in Audioletter No. 17) have failed to
fully reinstate the Rockefeller/Soviet alliance--so now anything can
happen. The Rockefeller brothers, who for so long have tried to play
God with their immense power, are now finding out that they too are
fallible and human, even if they still refuse to consciously admit it.
Today, my friends, the power of the Rockefeller empire is in the
process of destroying itself; but just as Samson pulled down the
temple around him, the Rockefeller brothers threaten to pull down
modern civilization around their heads as their power runs out of
control and collapses into the inferno of nuclear war.

    Earlier this month, on April 7, 1977, Prime Minister Rabin of
Israel resigned. The press has played up his resignation as if it were
another Watergate, but actually it was only a technicality having to
do with a modest bank account held here in Washington, D.C. by Rabin
against government regulations. Overnight Rabin was out of office, and
his public career has been described as ruined; but the real reason
for Rabin's lightning exit from Israeli politics was that he learned
of the CIA plot to ignite war in the Middle East, and he wanted no
part of it. It's almost a replay of Sir Harold Wilson's sudden
unexplained resignation as Prime Minister of Great Britain on March
16, 1976, just over a year ago; and as I explained then in monthly
Audioletter No. 10, Wilson resigned because he had learned of the
coming war plan and wanted nothing to do with it. And so the build-up
toward war continues, and our rulers know it. But what of the American
public in general? How many know what danger we are in? And
especially, how many believe it enough to do something about it? My
friends, most Americans today are on vacation from reality, but
reality will have to be faced one day in the not too distant future.

    My three special topics for today are: Topic #1--THE PRE-WAR
SABOTAGE OF AMERICA, Topic #2--THE COMING NAVAL BATTLE FOR THE UNITED
STATES AND THE WORLD, and Topic #3--THE UNTOLD PERSONAL SACRIFICE OF
GENERAL GEORGE S. BROWN.

Topic #1--In the early days of the 20th century the
Rockefeller/Standard Oil monopoly had already become supreme in the
United States, but abroad it faced two powerful competitors in oil.
One was the British Empire, whose destruction by means of two World
Wars I've discussed in a number of my past talking tapes. The other
foreign competitor was even bigger than the British Empire in oil, and
it was attacked and destroyed first. That competitor was Czarist
Russia. After the Bolshevik Revolution took place in 1917, property
owners and businessmen of all kinds were dispossessed and liquidated
in great numbers. And included in this, by design, was the utter
destruction of the oil fields, refineries, oil tankers, everything
having to do with oil. The small band of revolutionaries under Lenin
and Trotsky who had been sent into Russia with the help of Rockefeller
financing had done their job well; and within a few years the new
Communist regime of the Soviet Union welcomed the Rockefeller/Standard
Oil interests with open arms to re-develop the huge Russian oil
reserves. Ever since that day, right down to the present, practically
all of the oil leaving the Soviet Union has been carried in oil
tankers of the Rockefeller/Standard Oil empire under various names,
nominees, and national flags. For a thorough and most unusual expose
of the oil competition presented to the Rockefellers by Czarist
Russia, I highly recommend a new book by Robert V. Tolf, entitled THE
RUSSIAN ROCKEFELLERS--THE SAGA OF THE NOBEL FAMILY AND THE RUSSIAN OIL
INDUSTRY published by the Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
University, Stanford, Calif. 94305--the price is $15.95 postpaid.

    For decades following the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet rulers
were absolutely dependent upon an uninterrupted flow of transfusions
from the West of money, technical know-how, food, and arms. The
Kremlin ruled a huge nation with an iron fist, and the Rockefellers
shared this rule with the Kremlin. The Soviet Union, therefore,
appeared to be the perfect vehicle for bringing the entire world under
the control of the super-rich Rockefellers and their intimates. All
that was necessary, or so they thought, was to gradually build up the
Soviet system while bleeding to death the harder to control United
States and the western world. This was the situation the four
Rockefeller brothers inherited long ago-they literally grew up with
it, and could hardly imagine things being any different. But now
things are different. The Soviet Union can now survive without
continued outside help, and now they have been double-crossing the
Rockefellers and we the people will have to suffer for it. Now, both
the Rockefellers and the Soviets are maneuvering, playing a tricky
game, and all the while trying to emerge supreme from the conflict to
come. But, just as it was planned before the Rockefeller/Soviet
alliance began coming apart, the main and prime battleground is to be
the United States of America. The Soviet Union is busy at work trying
to weaken America here and abroad so that we can be defeated in
Nuclear War One; and the Rockefellers are trying to turn our nation
into a complete dictatorship under their domination. Both are trying
to bend the weakening of America's freedom to their own special
advantage.

    The centerpiece of the Rockefeller program to completely take over
America right now is the so-called CARTER ENERGY PROGRAM. Recently the
CIA s-u-d-d-e-n-l-y upgraded its estimates of Soviet spending for new
military equipment and installations to four times the previous figure
so as to alarm us. In a similar vein, the CIA has also provided Jimmy
Carter with grist for his energy mill to grind us into submission by
issuing a report saying world oil reserves are much lower than
previously thought. Both CIA reports are rubbish, issued purely for
propaganda purposes; so the CIA under Admiral Turner, who is a
Rockefeller man, is continuing with the preparations for the limited
nuclear strike from the Sinai in order to get the war started.
American F-15 fighter bombers are now available in the Sinai and would
hit all of the five or more Arab target areas with ease; and the
special low-yield nuclear weapons for the job are already on the
scene, currently stored underground at the so-called American
Monitoring Station in the Sinai. The bombs themselves are atomic, not
hydrogen, very clean, with primary blast effects confined to a radius
of only 300 to 400 yards--just right for a so-called surgical attack
to wipe out the oil wells in the target areas.

    As for America, even though the Alaskan oil is supposed to start
flowing through the pipeline this summer, it will not come into the
lower United States. It happens to be high sulphur oil of a type which
west-coast refineries cannot handle even though there have been ten
years to get ready for Alaskan oil. Instead, the Rockefeller plan is
to ship this oil to Japan at a handsome profit, of course, and make up
the difference with more imports of, guess what--Arab oil. When the
Arab oil is cut off, there will be some attempts to ship some of the
otherwise useless Alaskan oil to the Gulf Coast by small, inefficient
tankers through the Panama Canal, which is targeted both by underwater
missiles and by missiles in Guyana. The sharp drop in our oil supplies
will also help to intensify the reduction in food supplies, which is
already resulting from drought here in America. Many factors are
contributing to the drought situation, including not only the Soviet
weather modification activities I've mentioned in the past, but also
activities under Rockefeller control. For example, I mentioned in
Audioletter No. 9 for February 1976 that for years the Rockefeller oil
companies have been knowingly lowering the underground water table in
many areas of the Midwest and Great Plains by means of excessive
pumping from their oil wells; and now, in many of these very areas,
the problem of low ground water is adding to the drought crisis.

    Meanwhile, the Rockefellers never lose sight of their objectives,
no matter how much they are forced to change their tactics along the
way. Their objective for America is DICTATORSHIP, according to the
pattern spelled out in their secret New Constitution, which I revealed
in my Audio Book Talking Tape No. 4 released in July 1975. Under the
guise of "governmental reorganization", the provisions of their
dictatorial new constitution are being imposed on the United States
piecemeal, gradually, while our real Constitution is increasingly
"interpreted" out of existence.

    But of all the things that determine whether a nation will survive
or succumb in time of crisis, the human spirit is still the most
important. A strong spirit and deep resolve can overcome seemingly
insurmountable obstacles, and it can make a people impossible to
conquer; but a weak spirit, without convictions or values, leaves a
people defenseless--defenseless no matter how much armor they may wear
or what weapons they may command. This is why the human spirit has
been the most consistent target of all, both of the Rockefeller "One
World" group and of the rulers of the Soviet Union.

    Last month in Audioletter No. 22 I pointed out one of the extremes
in church philosophy that has been promoted wherever possible for
generations by the Rockefellers and their collaborators. This extreme
is to divorce the moral and spiritual lessons of religions from daily
decisions and actions, as if the two had no relationship to one
another except for lip service. For whatever reasons, this extreme is
personified today by one Jimmy Carter. The opposite extreme is equally
deadly, if not more so. This is to dilute the spiritual teaching for
which churches originally existed and replace it with preaching about
economic, political, and social issues. To do this is to play with
fire; but this is exactly what the National Council of Churches and
its sister organization the World Council of Churches have been doing
for decades. Prior to November 28, 1950, the National Council was
known as the Federal Council of Churches. For many years the Federal
Council had been dominated at the national level by the Rockefellers
and their agent John Foster Dulles, and was the recipient of several
grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. But the Federal Council became
so totally identified with political activism in support of socialist
causes that it became an object of increasing distrust. Accordingly,
the name was changed to the National Council of Churches, and its
tarnished halo was polished up with public assurances that this was a
new organization which would devote itself to the real business of the
church. There were many influential laymen in the churches under the
umbrella of the National Council who wanted to help insure that the
supposedly new organization would truly devote itself to proper areas
of church concern. Asa result, a National Lay Committee was brought
into being under the chairmanship of the late J. Howard Pug h, a truly
great American, who was the director and president of the Sun Oil Co.
when it was still free of the grasping clutches of the Rockefellers.
The National Lay Committee existed from March 28, 1951, until June 30,
1955.

    The whole story of what happened to the National Lay Committee of
the National Council of Churches is told in the "Chairman's Final
Report" by J. Howard Pugh. Unfortunately this important report has
long been suppressed and buried. I have in my possession one of the
very few copies still known to be in existence; therefore I will read
a few brief passages from the Chairman's Explanatory Letter, which
serves as a Foreword to the Report as a whole. These quotations are
taken in sequence; and although they do not do justice to Mr. Pugh's
complete explanatory letter, much less the entire 316-page Report, I
believe you will find them revealing:

   "In the failure of this most important effort to bring about an
enduring partnership between the clergy and laity, I feel a very real
responsibility to provide a comprehensive and factual account of those
steps which led to the Board's action--discontinuing lay
participation."

   "We lay people found ourselves not only deeply in the minority but
often poles apart from the clergy who invariably out-voted us 10 to 1
in these sessions."

   "The members of the Lay Committee were often misunderstood in their
urgency to keep the churches out of politics and their insistence on
the promisee evangelism. Our premise was that instead of appealing to
government, the church should devote its energies to the work of
promoting the attributes of Christianity--truth, honesty, fairness,
generosity, justice, and charity in the hearts and minds of men. We
attempted to emphasize that Christ stressed not the expanded State,
but the dignity and responsibility of the individual."

   "Their philosophy, it seemed to the Lay Committee, looked to an
ever-expanding government."

   "With few exceptions, the members of the Lay Committee had agreed
to serve only because they had been assured that the new National
Council would avoid the political involvements and controversies of
the old Federal Council of Churches, which was now superseded."

   "Most of the members of the Lay Committee came finally to the
realization that a wide chasm existed between the thinking of the
laity and the clergy and executives of the denominational bodies which
comprise the National Council."

   "Thus, on June 30, 1955, the Lay Committee ceased to exist as a
committee of the General Board."

   "The members of the Lay Committee believed, and so stated, that the
political adventures of the National Council in the fields of economic
and political controversy would seriously hinder and not further
Christian leadership in the pressing fields of evangelism, fellowship,
and education."

   "It appears from the record that the National Council could find no
room for opposition to the philosophies and practices carried over
from the old Federal Council. Lacking the patience to resolve the
basic problem, it has sought to bury it."

Thus ended, my friends, more than 20 years ago the last major effort
to deflect the Rockefeller-dominated National Council of Churches away
from its political programs and toward concern for spiritual matters.
After more than four years of frustrating effort, the National Lay
Committee was dissolved. This signaled the end of any influence of the
general church population of America on the policies of the National
Council of Churches. The National Council proceeded on its way,
proclaiming to the public that it represented 34,000,000 Protestants,
while using this power base to help undermine our free Republic. The
National Council has done much to help dull and weaken the spirit of
millions of Americans, softening our approach in opposition to
Communism. Let us hope and pray that in these dangerous days they will
at last see the light and begin to work at last to build up the
American spirit, instead of destroying it.

Topic #2--In monthly Audioletter No. 15 for August 1976, I explained
that the planting of short-range underwater-launch nuclear missiles in
our territorial waters was part of the Soviet naval strategy for the
United States and world conquest. The same continues to be the case
now. Admiral Gorshkoff, who has commanded the Soviet navy for more
than 20 years, has built it into a fighting force that is radically
different from any other navy the world has ever seen; and as we near
the very threshold of war, it is no accident that the Rockefeller
insider who now heads the CIA is also an Admiral--4-star Admiral
Stansfield Turner. The CIA has become the most powerful military
organization in the United States, and Nuclear War One will revolve
around naval strategy. Both the importance of the Soviet Navy and its
great difference from our own United States Navy can be illustrated by
just one fact: When the supersonic Backfire long-range bomber entered
operational service in the Soviet Union late in 1974, it did so
simultaneously with the Soviet Navy as well as with the Soviet Air
Force. This is like giving our own new supersonic bomber, the B-1, to
our Navy to fly--or, since we still do not have the B-1 to counter the
Soviet Backfire, having our navy fly B-52s. Of course our own navy
does not fly strategic bombers. The United States Navy, like the
British Navy and most of the other great navies of history, has as one
of its primary missions the protection of our sea lanes of commerce--a
war which is basically defensive in nature. Since World War II our
navy has also acquired offensive missions which have gradually assumed
greater importance, including the ability to attack an enemy from the
sea with the submarine-launched ballistic missiles. But the
traditional defensive mission of protecting our sea lanes can never be
neglected. Admiral Gorshkoff, however, has been able to concentrate on
building a navy which is almost totally offensive in character. Soviet
fishing trawlers, some of them genuine, roam the world; but the Soviet
Union does not depend for its survival on the sea nearly as much as
the United States. So the Soviet Navy is designed first and foremost
for offensive operations; and this not only includes the ability to
interdict enemy sea lanes and attack enemy naval forces at sea, it
also includes an unprecedented emphasis on projecting naval power
ashore. This in turn means not only the ability to carry out
amphibious assaults and tactical bombardment, but strategic attack--a
role we usually tend to think of only in terms of the Soviet Air Force
with its ICBMs and bombers.

    The new Soviet Navy of Admiral Gorshkoff also differs from ours in
another way. Aside from missile submarines, the American Navy is
structured around the aircraft carrier; whereas the Soviet Navy is
built around the submarine. American task forces include all kinds of
ships designed to coordinate with the needs and capabilities of the
aircraft carrier. By the same token, Soviet surface ships of all kinds
are intended to support the huge submarine force in various ways. This
applies even to the new Soviet aircraft carriers which are now
beginning to appear on the scene since Soviet naval aviation is
heavily oriented toward anti-submarine warfare, although it has other
capabilities as well. The relative naval capabilities of the Soviet
Union and the United States have never been considered in the
Strategic Arms Limitations Talks, the SALT talks, except with regard
to sea-launch ballistic missiles; and yet it is the coming naval
confrontation that could all by itself determine the outcome of
Nuclear War One.  It is often forgotten, for example, that the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is primarily a naval alliance. We
hear frequently about NATO in the controlled major media of the United
States as though the only problems were Army problems--such as rusty
tanks and lack of spare parts; and when the Supreme Allied Commander,
Europe, who is presently General Alexander Haig, is mentioned in the
news, he is often called the head of NATO, or some such, but actually
he's only one of three co-equal Commanders in NATO. The other two are
Naval Commanders--they are the Commander-in-Chief, Channel Command;
and the Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic, the latter based at
Norfolk, Va. NATO depends for its very life on its naval strength,
including the ability to keep open the vital North Atlantic sea lanes.
But now, Soviet naval Backfire bombers with air-to-surface, anti-ship
missiles threaten to cut those North Atlantic sea lanes in time of
war; and the Mediterranean, which was once dominated by the United
States Navy, is now heavily populated by the Soviet Navy as well.
While the Soviet Navy has undergone explosive growth over the past
decade to the formidable armed force that it is today, the United
States Navy has been allowed to shrink to half its former size with
more and more ships aging and obsolescent. When the Arab oil is cut
off by war soon, Europe will have to fall back on its meager reserves,
which will run out within 60 to 90 days. Interdiction of NATO sea
lanes at that point by the Soviet Union could cause all of Europe to
fall like a plum into Soviet hands. This is especially true in light
of the short-range Soviet underwater missiles in European territorial
waters, which I mentioned in Audioletter No. 22 last month. So far
only Great Britain shows signs of being able to withstand such a
course of events. As I mentioned last month, the British government
had requested the latest missile coordinates from me, and I had
supplied them. Of the 29 Soviet missiles around the British Isles at
that time, all but one had been removed by the Royal Navy as of April
18--6 days ago. However, I have been informed of 3 newly planted
missiles there, and I have relayed these to the British for action.
Great Britain also may have the benefit of her new North Sea oil
fields which, barring sabotage or the like, should make Britain
independent of foreign oil producers in the near future.

    Since I spoke to you last, action has been taken in another area
also. Acting on information which I relayed, of the 8 missiles around
southern Africa, seven have now been taken up. At last report,
however, the missile lying off Mozambique targeted on Rhodesia was
still in place. Such removals of missiles are better than no action at
all, but they are still no more than holding actions. What is needed,
if war is to be prevented, is for this deadly cat-and-mouse game to be
stopped altogether by revealing to the whole world what the Soviet
Navy is up to. Late last September, as I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 16, the United States had a golden opportunity to do
just that, and to do so while the Soviet underwater missile threat was
only a small fraction of what it is now. At that time, a Soviet
missile-laying mini-sub equipped with sonar-defeating design features
entered Chesapeake Bay and became trapped there, due to a malfunction
that ultimately killed the crew. It was a perfect opportunity for the
United States to pick up the sub, display it on television world-wide
by satellite, and tell the Soviet Union that the jig was up; but
instead, as I revealed in Audioletter No. 17 the following month, the
Red Friday agreement on October 1, 1976 reinstated a strained alliance
between the Rockefellers and the Soviets, and the Soviet Navy was
allowed to enter Chesapeake Bay under cover of darkness and recover
the mini-sub. But now, a similar opportunity exists once again--not in
American waters but in those of Norway. In March 1977 a Soviet
submarine entered the fjord of Folda on the north coast of Norway. The
Norwegians detected its presence and sealed off the exit to wait for
the sub to surface. On April 4, 1977, the story was broken in European
press, although the location was not mentioned. To my knowledge,
however, it has received no mention anywhere in the United States. I
strongly suggest to the Norwegian government that before the Soviet
submarine be allowed to escape, a search be made at the navigational
coordinates 64 35' 23" north, 10 23' 14" east. This location is not
far from where the Soviet submarine is trapped and is the site of one
of the seven Soviet underwater missiles that have been planted
recently in Norwegian waters. Should the government of Norway so
request, I will naturally provide the other locations as well, through
proper channels.

    As for the United States, there continues to be no effort at all
to clear our waters of the Soviet nuclear weapons which threaten our
country. As of my latest report a few days ago, not one of the 158
Soviet missiles and hydrogen bombs lurking in our territorial waters
has been removed, and I have not been approached in any way by the
United States government with requests for their locations. Meanwhile
the Soviet plutonium cloud attacks on the United States are still
continuing by means of the new canisters which are being deployed
close to shore along the West Coast, which I mentioned last month. Of
the 16 canisters which were deployed at the time I recorded
Audioletter No. 22 last month, 11 had been discharged as of April 15,
but by then there were 17 new ones. At last report, these canisters
are being deployed along the entire West Coast from San Diego to
Seattle. These are extremely easy and simple to deploy--for example,
they are dropped from aircraft flying under our radar like the Soviet
Bear bombers that we were told about by news reports the other day.
They are also planted by Soviet trawlers, since they are allowed to
enter our new 200-mile fishing zone to catch certain fish there. The
fact that this is being done was proven by the arrested Soviet trawler
Taras Shevchenko which was carrying plutonium canisters in a
compartment near the stern of the ship.

    Thus the maneuvering in preparation for Nuclear War One continues
with a strong naval emphasis. At one level, Rockefeller agents in
America appear to continue to cooperate in the joint plan of conquest
with the Soviets; but on the real level the Soviets and the
Rockefellers are both jockeying for a decisive knock-out blow. In
this, time is on the side of the Soviet Union, so they're trying to
delay war slightly while the Rockefeller brothers are trying to hurry
it up; and to condition us all for it, the Carter Administration is
flexing its muscles to show us how strong it is when it comes to the
Soviets. In short order it has forcefully espoused Human Rights,
handed the Soviets an ultimatum on SALT talks, seized Soviet fishing
trawlers, chased Soviet Bear long-range turbo-prop bombers away from
the southeast coast of our country--and what's next? A photo of a
Soviet submarine in our waters? Already the Rockefeller position has
decayed further in the past several months because of the further
deterioration of their CIA undersea super-missiles in the Atlantic and
Pacific. Of the fleet of 14 such missiles which I described in
Audioletter No. 20, January 1977, all 5 in the Pacific have now sprung
leaks and are no longer usable. Of the 9 in the Atlantic, 4 have now
failed--missiles #4, 6, 7, and 8. That leaves only 5 of the original
fleet of 14 CIA missiles still available for Rockefeller threats
against their Soviet partners. Meanwhile the Soviet short-range
missiles in our waters in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf
of Mexico are now being used by the Soviets to further weaken our
position as a nation.

    But, my friends, that's not all. For the very first time Soviet
missiles have now been planted in the Great Lakes. From there they now
threaten Chicago, Racine, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Bay City, Erie,
Buffalo, Rochester, and other cities of our industrial heartland. At
present there are exactly 50 such missiles in the Great Lakes. These,
however, are single warhead, short-range missiles, and are even
smaller in size than the multiple warhead missiles that have been
planted along our East, West, and Gulf Coasts. As if this were not
enough, I have just been alerted that Soviet agents are now fanning
out across America planting small hydrogen bombs in selected inland
lakes. The primary targets here are major dams, but some other  targets
are also involved. Since the Federal government refuses to take
action, it's imperative that State governments--especially those in
the West--take action now to protect their citizens. Security patrols
around major dams and lakes should be beefed up immediately and placed
on full alert. In addition, search operations must be performed to
locate those bombs that have already been planted so that they can be
removed. Already, Soviet underwater nuclear devices have been planted
in 21 places within the United States, and more are being planted.
Nineteen (19) of the targets are dams, the other 2 are cities.
CALIFORNIA has 4--Oroville Dam north of Sacramento, Castaic Dam north
of Los Angeles, Shasta Dam in north California, and Otay Reservoir Dam
near San Diego. ARIZONA also has 4 bombs--Glen Canyon Dam, Coolidge
Dam, Theodore Roosevelt Dam, and Lake Pleasant Dam near Phoenix. NEW
MEXICO has 3--the Navajo Dam, Blue Mesa Dam, and Alfa Butte Dam.
MONTANA has 3--Fort Peck Dam, Yellow Tail Dam, and Hungry Horse Dam.
NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NEVADA, and WASHINGTON STATE so
far have 1 bomb each, threatening dams which are among the world's
largest--these are respectively Garrison Dam, Oahe Dam, Fort Randall
Dam, Hoover Dam, and Grand Coulee Dam. IDAHO has 2 bombs, both
threatening towns--one is in the north end of Cour d'Alene Lake,
threatening the town of that name; the other is in the north end of
Lake Pend Oreille near the town of Sandpoint. My friends, this would
not have been possible had it not been for the destruction of the FBI
beginning with the murder of J. Edgar Hoover. God help us all.

Topic #3--With our military situation so serious, one would naturally
expect someone to come forward to take action against the Soviet
underwater missiles. For example, General George S. Brown, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, brought about the removal of many of these
ocean and gulf missiles during August and September 1976. But where is
he now?!! My friends, here is what has happened to General Brown. No
matter how much the tactics of public manipulation change and shift,
some things never change. I mentioned several months ago in connection
with the disgraceful Sputnik One episode that nowadays accolades and
awards go to the spoilers and traitors in our midst, while the true
heroes who dare to raise their heads are beaten down, suppressed, and
forgotten. Today there is no more grim testimony to this fact than the
current predicament of General George S. Brown.

    As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Brown is the top
military officer in the United States, and therefore in some respects
in the entire free world. As I revealed in detail in monthly
Audioletter No. 16 for September 1976, it was he, General Brown, who
more than any other person in the United States government, prevented
a surprise Soviet nuclear attack on America during August and
September 1976. Under extremely adverse conditions, he obtained the
go-ahead to remove Soviet underwater missiles and hydrogen bombs then
planted in our own territorial waters and then ordered the United
States Navy to do the job, which it did quickly. And on September 16,
1976, I met for over an hour with General Brown in his office at the
Pentagon to discuss the continuing Soviet underwater missile crisis
and to relay new information to him which had been prevented from
reaching him through normal channels. In meeting with me, General
Brown was accepting terrible personal risks, and he knew it. He had
overruled his entire staff in order to meet with me, and the meeting
itself was completely free of interruptions of any kind. Nor was there
any cut-off due to time; the meeting simply continued without pressure
until we finished the business at hand. Then I left, along with an
associate who had accompanied me to the meeting as a witness. We drove
away from the Pentagon that day in a driving rainstorm; but the brave
patriot whose office we had just left now faced a far worse personal
storm--thanks to his efforts on our nation's behalf. I warned my
listeners about this in monthly Audioletter No. 16 last September, and
asked that everyone strengthen his hand by expressing their support
for him.

    General Brown, alone among the top echelons of the United States
government, had stood by us and had saved millions of our lives in the
process. Now he was depending on us to stand by him in his continuing
efforts to carry out his Constitutional duties to the letter. Some of
us did so, my friends, but far too many of us did not. During August
and early September 1976, the Joint Chiefs of Staff were flooded with
demands for action against the Soviet underwater missiles; but after
that action was taken, there was no such massive outpouring of thanks
for General Brown's crucial leadership or support for the continued
positive efforts needed to save our country. Far too many of us forget
that it is not enough just to complain about what is wrong; we must
also actively support that which is right, or it will wither and die.
After the crucial actions taken under General Brown's leadership late
last summer, far too many of us just relaxed and went back to sleep,
leaving General Brown to fend for himself.

    Now I must tell you what has happened to General Brown as a
result. For many months now I have been cut off from direct contact
with General Brown; and in recent months General Brown has seemed like
a completely different person than in the past whenever he appears in
public. In place of the outgoing personality which has been General
Brown's trademark in the past, there is nothing but resignation and
acceptance of the dictates of his civilian superiors. The change has
been so dramatic that it has even been commented upon by syndicated
columnists, who are mystified. What has happened to General Brown, my
friends, is known to very few. I myself have been able to confirm it
only within the past few days. General George S. Brown, the nation's
top military officer, is now virtually under house arrest. This is
exactly the same kind of confinement that was meted out, for example,
to Army Lieutenant William Calley during his court martial for the My
Lai massacre in Vietnam. But there are two differences in General
Brown's case. First, there has been no court martial. Instead, he is
living under the threat of a court martial, for its twisted evidence
and perjuring witnesses have already been assembled. Second, General
Brown's isolation at the Pentagon and confinement to his Fort Myer
residence are not absolute. Instead, they are interspersed with very
carefully controlled appearances at official functions, since his
absence from these would quickly arouse suspicions that something was
terribly wrong. Now, should General Brown attempt again to step out of
line and defy those in high places by giving orders to remove the
missiles, doing his Constitutional duty, the suspended threat of court
martial would instantly come crashing down upon him. By means of the
elaborately doctored and falsified evidence I've already mentioned,
General Brown would be railroaded into certain conviction for treason
for doing his duty. Already alleged statements by General Brown have
been published recently to make him appear to be a dangerous man. Were
General Brown to be courtmartialed with falsified evidence, it would
destroy him personally. It would also prevent his efforts from
producing any benefits to America--such as a resumption of the removal
of Soviet nuclear missiles from our waters. Any such orders of his
would be rescinded; and his courtmartial would be used to make any
attempts by him to warn America useless, by destroying his
credibility.

    As long ago as October, 1976, just a month after my meeting with
him, General Brown was given a powerful demonstration of the ability
of his enemies to crucify him publicly. As I discussed that month in
Audioletter No. 17, a six-month old interview of General Brown was
dredged up and used to subject him to intense public embarrassment and
criticism. A few alleged statements of his from the interview were
made public and played up by th e controlled major media  to such an
extent that he was forced to make a public apology on nationwide
television. Can you imagine? All of that for a few relatively
insignificant comments which, if he really made them at all, had
attracted no attention six months earlier. This episode had just one
purpose--to prove to General Brown that if the falsified charges of
treason should ever be leveled at him, he would have no chance at all
either to defend himself or to do a service to America. His only
recourse now would be to himself publicly demand a court-martial, but
even that would not be successful without a massive outpouring of
public support for him ahead of time--and that, my friends, has so far
been denied him to the everlasting shame of our entire nation. Should
General Brown come to any physical harm, the responsibility for it
will rest squarely on the shoulders of David, Nelson, Laurance, and
John D. Rockefeller III; but meanwhile, he's a secret captive, keeping
millions of Americans reassured that all is well merely by his
presence on the scene. Whenever a public or official appearance or
statement by General Brown is called for, it's arranged and carried
out under the watchful eyes of a heavy escort, although this is not
always apparent. Otherwise the openness, the accessibility, and warmth
that has always distinguished General Brown among newspaper reporters
is now gone. He's a virtual prisoner at the Pentagon, held practically
incommunicado except for the carefully controlled communications and
appearances I have already mentioned. As soon as this Audioletter is
released, you can expect to see things happen that may seem to
disprove what I am telling you--for example, General Brown may become
more visible publicly for a while. It is even conceivable, though
highly unlikely, that this might even be carried to the point of
having General Brown publicly deny that he has come under any new
restrictions in recent months as the result, say, of the unfavorable
publicity he received some months ago. Should that happen, keep in
mind that General Brown is now a prisoner of war, imprisoned by the
enemies within our own midst; and we've already seen many examples of
the kinds of things American prisoners of war are forced to say for
propaganda purposes.

    Yes, my friends, General Brown stood up for all of us only to have
too many of us let him down by failing to follow through with our
thanks and our overwhelming support; but there is one way that we can
still keep General Brown's great personal sacrifice on our behalf from
being in vain, and that is for us, each and every one of us as
individuals, to begin right now to do whatever we can to save our
beloved country. My friends, there's no vacation from reality. It's up
to you to do what you can--there's no one else; and even though you
may not be able to do more than write a letter or two, do it. You
never know how far your few words may spread. They may pass from one
person to another, finally reaching the ear of someone you don't even
know, someone with far more resources than you have who may play a
vital role in saving our nation, yet who may never hear and never act
if you fail to do your part. If all you have to offer is 5 loaves and
2 fishes, offer it; you just might be amazed at the results.

    Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and
may God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])